Wishlist Watch nextSign in

Trailer

C.O.G.

2013Movie1 h 32 minR

59

DecentGoodWatch score

Rotten Tomatoes

A comedy movie about growing up and everyday modern life.

Good for friends night · teens · thought-provoking

Where to watch

Set your services

Fingerprint

Not for scares, adrenaline or brutality.

Movies with

Story

A gay cocky young man travels to Oregon to work on an apple farm. Out of his element, he finds his lifestyle and notions being picked apart by everyone who crosses his path.

Feels like

Independent Drama
Coming-of-Age
Culture Clash
Identity Exploration
Rural Setting
Character Study
Queer Cinema
Humorous Undertones
Self-Discovery

Cast

19 of 19

Crew

Directed by: Kyle Patrick Alvarez
Written by: Kyle Patrick Alvarez, David Sedaris
Produced by: Kyle Patrick Alvarez, Stephen Nemeth, Cookie Carosella
Music by: Joe Berry, Steve Reich

Everyone

Pick a department, or search for a name or a job (“editor”, “stunt”).

Facts

September 20, 2013 · 1 h 32 min · R

Released: September 20, 2013
Runtime: 1 h 32 min
Age rating: R
Content: Strong Language
Genres: Comedy, Drama
Original language: English
Made in: United States
Available in: 10 countries

Q&A

4 questions, like "Where can I stream C.O.G.?"

Questions about C.O.G.

Quick answers from GoodWatch data.

Where can I stream C.O.G.?

Fandango at Home Free

In the United States, C.O.G. streams on fuboTV, and it is free with ads on The Roku, Kanopy, Fandango at Home Free, Plex, Fawesome, Xumo Play, and Tubi TV. You can rent or buy it from Google Play Movies, YouTube, and Fandango At Home. It also streams in 2 other countries.

Is C.O.G. worth watching?

59

DecentGoodWatch score

Opinions are mixed, with a GoodWatch score of 59 (IMDb 5.6, Rotten Tomatoes 69%, and Metacritic 60). Critics rate it higher (65 out of 100) than audiences (55).

Will C.O.G. make me laugh?

A touch

Not much for a comedy: the title analysis gives its humor 1 of 4.

Is C.O.G. plot-driven or character-driven?

CharactersPlot

Mostly character-driven: it leans on character depth (8 of 10) and dialogue centrality (7 of 10) more than on its plot.