Invisible Diplomats

1965Movie21 minNR

73
GoodGoodWatch score

A documentary movie.

Good for teens · background watch · comfort watch

Where to watch

Set your services

Not streaming in any country yet.

Fingerprint

Not for scares, brutality or laughs.

Movies with

Story

The film revolves around the daily operations at a business switchboard, highlighting the interactions between Connie, Kelly, and their colleagues. Connie is excited about her boyfriend Brad's success in securing a significant deal, while Kelly shares her frustrations about the inefficiencies at the switchboard. The dialogue illustrates the importance of communication and professionalism in business, emphasizing how switchboard operators, though often unseen, play a crucial role in maintaining a positive company image and facilitating important calls. The narrative concludes with Connie preparing for a date with Brad, reflecting on the significance of their work.

Feels like

  • Vintage Business Culture
  • Switchboard Operations
  • Workplace Dynamics
  • Early Telecommunications
  • Office Life
  • Human Connection
  • Professional Etiquette
  • Simple Storytelling

Cast

Crew

Directed by
LeRoy Prinz
Produced by
Terry Croghan
Music by
Dean Gilmore

Everyone

Pick a department, or search for a name or a job (“editor”, “stunt”).

Facts

January 1, 1965 · 21 min · NR

Released
January 1, 1965
Runtime
21 min
Age rating
NR
Genres
Documentary
Original language
English
Made in
United States

Q&A

3 questions, like "Is Invisible Diplomats worth watching?"

Questions about Invisible Diplomats

Quick answers from GoodWatch data.

Is Invisible Diplomats worth watching?

73
GoodGoodWatch score

Mostly, it's well received, with a GoodWatch score of 73 (IMDb 6.7).

Can I half-watch Invisible Diplomats?

Easy watchDemanding

Yes: it's easy to follow, with complexity at only 3 of 10, and the viewing guide calls it good for background watching.

Is Invisible Diplomats plot-driven or character-driven?

CharactersPlot

Mostly character-driven: it leans on dialogue centrality (8 of 10) and character depth (5 of 10) more than on its plot.